On 17 January 2019, the Singapore Ministry of Law and the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore issued the Singapore Copyright Review Report (the Report), which proposes some of the critical amendments to the Singapore Copyright Act (the CA), following numerous rounds of public consultations in 2016 and 2017.
The goal of the proposed amendments is to make sure that the Singapore copyright regime keeps abreast of technological developments that have substantially changed how innovative works are created, disseminated, and fed on. In this regard, the proposed amendments seek to protect creators’ rights and customers’ access to copyrighted works.
This note summarises the important things proposed amendments within the Report.
The key proposed modifications that would fortify the creators’ rights are as follows:
1. Default possession of commissioned works
Currently, in which sure works are commissioned, the commissioning party is the default copyright owner. The Report proposes that the creators of creative works shall have the first possession of commissioned work until agreed in any other case.
At present, authors and performers no longer have the right to be attributed under the CA. Instead, the Report proposes that authors and performers be attributed when others utilize their paintings or overall performance. However, this right will no longer be applied to positive works and performances together with a laptop program or paintings created in the course of employment.
The key proposed modifications that could enhance customers’ access to copyrighted works are:
1. New educational use exception
Teaching strategies have evolved past using traditional standardized textbooks and workbooks. Instead, the digital gear and online substances and publications, blogs, and videos by academic institutions to train are now common.
The Report proposes a brand new cause-primarily based exception for academic uses by non-profit educational institutions with a purpose to observe online work; this is available without the need for payment at the time of obtaining the right of entry.
2. New text and records mining exception
The preliminary levels of textual content and information mining typically entail extracting or copying records from materials that can be included employing copyright, textual content, and facts mining dangers infringing at the copyright in these substances.
The Report proposes a new exception inside the CA, which allows copying of copyrighted works for the functions of facts analysis to support the increase of the information analytics and massive records business sector. However, the user of the paintings should have had valid get entry to the paintings within the first vicinity. Therefore, simply copying without evaluation could not be secure under the brand new exception.
3. New exception relating to galleries, libraries, data, and museums
The Report proposes a brand new exception to permit museums and non-profit galleries, non-profit libraries, and non-profit information to make copies or perform audio-visual materials for the exhibition if such materials are within the permanent collection of the organization. Copies of objects can also be made to include in the exhibition associated with publicity materials.
Other proposals within the Report include:
1. New magnificence licensing scheme for collective control enterprises (CMOS)
The Report proposes to introduce a class licensing scheme for CMOS, which is unregulated nowadays. The new scheme aims to assist creators who want to license their work and users who want price-effective access to works by facilitating copyright licensing transactions effectively. Any CMOS in Singapore might be robotically concerned about this scheme to be administered by using IPOS. Further information on the licensing scheme and license situations may be announced at a later date.
During the 2016 public consultation, it concluded that set-pinnacle boxes were an occurrence that enables access to audio-visual content material from unauthorized sources, regularly outside Singapore. However, copyright owners cannot take any enforcement measures in opposition to the producers, importers, distributors, or outlets of such set-pinnacle packing containers. This is because these do not contain infringing content material per se.
The Report proposes that new legislative provisions can be brought to impose civil and crook liability on individuals who willfully make, import for sale, commercially distribute, or sell such set-pinnacle bins or any other merchandise that similarly permit entry of audio-visual content from unauthorized sources.
