Law Cer
  • Home
  • Attorney
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
    • Child Law
    • Copyright Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Traffic law
    • Women Law
  • Cyber law
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
  • Pages
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • DMCA
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
    • Child Law
    • Copyright Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Traffic law
    • Women Law
  • Cyber law
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
  • Pages
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • DMCA
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Law Cer
No Result
View All Result
Home Family law

Bombay HC Refuses To Interfere With Family Court Order Directing seventy five-Yr-Old To Pay Rs.1L Compensation To 72-Year-Old Wife Under DV Act

Clyde Osborne by Clyde Osborne
August 20, 2022
in Family law
0

The Bombay High Court these days refused to intervene with an order of the family court

Bombay HC Refuses To Interfere With Family Court Order Directing seventy five-Yr-Old To Pay Rs.1L Compensation To 72-Year-Old Wife Under DV Act 1

docket directing a seventy-five-year-old guy to pay Rs.1 lakh in compensation to his 72-12 months-old spouse under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

A division bench of Justice Akhil Kureshi and Justice Sarang Kotwal denied comfort to Subhash Anand, the appellant-husband who challenged the order of the Family Court, Mumbai, dated September 18, 2018. The court also authorized the respondent’s wife to get the right of entry to the upper ground of the house wherein her husband is living on the floor ground.

“For numerous years, they’re having a matrimonial dispute. The unlucky factor of the matter is that the Respondent Wife had filed the Criminal Misc at such advanced age. Application before Gurgaon Court complaining of home violence on the fingers of the husband,” the court determined.

In her utility before the circle of relatives court, the respondent spouse had prayed for restraining her husband from dispossessing her from the matrimonial home in Walkeshwar, Mumbai.

The circle of relatives court allowed her software. It surpassed numerous guidelines, including restraining the appellant-husband or his servants from entering the higher floor of the house to protect the wife’s right to reside under Sections 17 and 19 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Article Summary show
In its order, the family courtroom said-
The court docket made positive minor modifications to the family court order, however, refused to live it and located-

In its order, the family courtroom said-

“The respondent is directed to pay reimbursement of Rs.1 lakh to the petitioner underneath Sec.22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for committing an act of home violence through inflicting mental torture, emotional misery. To the petitioner.”

The Appellant husband’s lawyer Pandit Kasar submitted that the husband has agreed not to dispossess the wife without an order of the court docket. Whereas respondent spouses recommend, Chandana Salgaonkar argued that the husband had proven abusive and violative tendencies in the past. Therefore, the order exceeded via the family courtroom needs to be persevered without interim modification or live.

The court docket made positive minor modifications to the family court order, however, refused to live it and located-

“We have perused the order passed using the Family Court and sifted through the opposite documents on a document with the restrained purpose of offering for meantime relief pending the very last listening to of Family Court Appeal. However, when the husband himself has agreed now not to dispossess the spouse from the said belongings, anyways, consequently, the question of staying route issued by the Family Court in this recognize does now not stand up.”

One of the most popular modern trends in family law is collaborative law which refers to the structured process which provides parties seeking divorces or parties involved in other disputes an alternative names of resolving their dispute rather than going through the costly, lengthy litigation process in courts. Collaborative law allows the parties to the marriage or proposed civil union to control their destiny by hiring family lawyers committed to resolving disputes in family and relationships within the family setting amicably through discussions and negotiations without the courts being involved.

Modern family law discourages the parties from going to court because courts’ decisions have a win-lose outlook. The court litigation is also complex, and as is the case with all matters of law, it is costly and may take a long time to solve matters.

In collaborative family law, disputes between family members can be settled amicably to ensure that their relationship as a family is preserved. The collaborative family lawyers agree that they will not represent their respective parties in court litigation if either party decides to go to court. In the jurisdictions where it has been applied, collaborative family law has achieved good results in the amicable solution of family disputes. In some instances, it has successfully reconciled parties who would otherwise have divorced had the matter been decided by the courts.

Clyde Osborne

Clyde Osborne

My passion is writing, blogging and speaking about issues related to children, women, social development, religion, politics and economics. I have written articles for magazines, newspapers and news websites. I have spoken at many conferences and events and published several books. I have worked as an editor and publisher of an international magazine and two online newspapers. In addition to my professional work, I am also very active in my community and I do volunteer work.

Related Posts

How to Find a Separation Lawyer for Your Business
Family law

How to Find a Separation Lawyer for Your Business

January 23, 2023
Navigating Family Law: Child Custody and Communities
Family law

Navigating Family Law: Child Custody and Communities

December 17, 2022
What Businesses Should Know About the EU’s New Directive on Copyright Law
Family law

Gem Family Law – What Is It?

November 13, 2022
Next Post
Get The Best Darwin NT Family Law Personal Injury Workers Compensation Lawyer

Get The Best Darwin NT Family Law Personal Injury Workers Compensation Lawyer

UK: No Fault Divorce Reform Will rework Family Law In England And Wales

UK: No Fault Divorce Reform Will rework Family Law In England And Wales

Australia: Family Law for the Future document: a evaluate of the family court system

Australia: Family Law for the Future document: a evaluate of the family court system

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
Maill us: admin@lawcer.com

© 2023 lawcer - All Rights Reserved lawcer.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Attorney
  • Law
    • Accident Law
    • Business Law
    • Child Law
    • Copyright Law
    • Criminal law
    • Family law
    • International Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Traffic law
    • Women Law
  • Cyber law
  • Divorce
  • Legal Advice
  • Pages
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • DMCA
    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us

© 2023 lawcer - All Rights Reserved lawcer.